A coalition of global groups against sleaze has expressed fears that the unceremonious exit of former Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Acting Chairman, Mr. Ibrahim Magu, may erode the recent gains in the fight against corruption.
Anti-corruption groups, Re: Common, Globalwitness and The Corner House based in Europe said Nigeria has regained unprecedented gains under Magu‘s leadership of EFCC and that his removal Under the current circumstances may roll back the momentous gains already recorded under his tenure.
In a letter to President Muhammadu Buhari last week, Re:Common top official Mr. Lucas Manes; Nicholas Hildyard of Corner House; and Simon Taylor of Globalwitness expressed deep concern over the travails of Magu saying that the former EFCC boss may be a pawn in the desperate attempts by corrupt officials to kill the EFCC or turn the agency into a willing tool of corrupt politicians.
The letter was signed by Manes, Hildyard, Taylor and their Nigerian counterpart, Human and Environmental Development Agenda, (HEDA Resource Centre) Chairman, Mr. Olanrewaju Suraju.
“What is going on in Nigeria is of concern to the international community. Mr. Magu has proved himself to be up to the task. His determination to fight corruption is evident by the recovery of stolen funds and properties plus his own high moral ground earned at the cost of diligence and hard work never before seen.
“His political removal questions the will of Nigeria to deal with a major cause of the country’s underdevelopment which is corruption,” the groups said in a letter delivered to the Nigerian President.
Some of the groups’ most significant contributions to Nigeria’s anti-graft effort is the historic exposure of Nigeria’s top oil companies linked to large scale corruption and their on-going trial in Italy and other European courts.
The coalition said: “We are therefore greatly alarmed – as are others in the international anti-corruption movement – by reports that Mr. Magu has been detained and/or suspended following allegations against him that were reportedly made by the Attorney General Malami directly to you.”
They said the international community is not opposed to Mr. Magu being investigated since all allegations of corruption must be thoroughly probed but rather that due process and the proper disciplinary procedures have not been followed.
“The procedures are clearly being hijacked by detractors of Magu in the political space and this is eroding the potential credibility of the outcome of the panel constituted to probe these allegations. The hounding of Magu through seemingly politically-connected sponsored media harassment only makes matters worse,” the groups stated in the letter.
The groups said they have been investigating corruption by Nigerian politicians and officials and the complicity of European and US banks, companies and others in facilitating such corruption.
The coalition’s particular focus on corrupt acquisition by Shell and Eni of the OPL245 oil field, had exposed alleged corruption by two former Attorney Generals of Nigeria together with former oil ministers. Though, the companies and individuals that are being prosecuted have all denied wrongdoing but has proved that oil giants operating in Nigeria regarded as sacred cows can be made to face the weight of law abroad.
The current prosecution in Italy had resulted directly from a complaint made by the organizations to the Milan Prosecutor, which in turn led to the seizure and subsequent return of OPL 245 funds frozen in the London courts. Magu gave full support while Buhari insisted that the evidence should be followed wherever it leads.
These and other actions, the coalition said, have significantly improved Nigeria’s standing internationally. As a recent report by the prestigious University of Edinburgh-led Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence programme records: “Nigeria’s anti-corruption law enforcement efforts are gradually growing more effective as practitioners adapt and innovate in response to many persistent challenges.”
The report praised Magus’s EFCC as “a robust and effective organization” but warned that it has “tough choices to make about its future direction, especially how it resists political influence.”
To curtail such interference, the report concludes, it will require leadership to “institute and enforce a zero-tolerance policy toward executive branch interference with anti-corruption agencies.”
They also observed that “the unique work of the group on OPL245 and also investigating Diezani Alison-Madueke, Kola Aluko, P&ID and others, has involved close engagement with the EFCC.
“We have been hugely impressed by the dedication of its investigators and by the disciplined leadership shown by Magu. The agency is completely different from the sclerotic, timid, politically captured bureaucracy that it was In the previous period. The credit for this is due in large part to you for appointing Magu and sticking with him despite efforts to unseat him.”
It noted that the respect that Nigeria has gained is exemplified by the recognition accorded to Magu, not least by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, which recently honoured him with an Award of Excellence.
“We note that many of the allegations reportedly made by the Attorney General have already been investigated by same Attorney General under your instruction in 2017 and that Magu was exonerated in respect of the corruption allegations: only those related to insubordination were freshly leveled. We are concerned that accusations of “insubordination” risk crossing the line that ensures the independence of prosecutors from political interference” adding that despite bearing false witness being illegal, no-one has been investigated or charged in relation to bringing the false allegations against Magu in 2017.
“We realize that you have been placed in an invidious position by the Attorney General. However, we very much hope that you will find a way forward that protects the huge strides made by the EFCC under Magu’s acting chairmanship. We very much doubt if the Italian case would have reached the stage that it has without his committed and diligent response to Mutual Legal Assistance requests. At this critical stage in the trial, his replacement for political reasons would be wholly regrettable and would only give succor to those being prosecuted,” the groups said.
