In a candid interview, Alhaji Sule Lamido, a prominent figure in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and former governor of Jigawa State, addressed the myriad challenges facing the party while expressing optimism about reclaiming power from President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 elections.
Lamido emphasized that the issues plaguing the PDP are reflective of broader societal challenges in Nigeria, urging a holistic understanding of the political landscape. He argued that the party’s struggles are not isolated but rather symptomatic of the Nigerian spirit, which he believes is characterized by a lack of discipline, patience, and tolerance.
Reflecting on the party’s recent electoral losses, Lamido asserted that understanding the root causes is vital for moving forward. He lamented that while the PDP once aimed to restore unity and confidence in Nigeria, it has failed to build on past successes. The former governor pointed out that many current leaders, including those in the ruling APC, have roots in the PDP, highlighting a shared political heritage that transcends party lines.
When asked about the influence of Nyesom Wike, Lamido described him as a product of the PDP’s own making, asserting that Wike’s current position is a manipulation of the political environment rather than a strategic placement by Tinubu. He criticized Wike’s actions as detrimental to the PDP, suggesting that such betrayals ultimately harm both the party and Tinubu’s administration.
Looking ahead to the 2027 elections, Lamido acknowledged the formidable challenges that lie ahead, particularly with the current administration’s grip on power. He called for a collective effort among Nigerians to prioritize national interest over individual ambitions, emphasizing that genuine commitment to the country’s development is essential for any political alliance.
In discussing the potential for a new political platform emerging from disillusioned members of the APC and PDP, Lamido stressed the importance of shared values and a sincere commitment to Nigeria’s future. He rejected any alliance based solely on the pursuit of power without a moral foundation.
As for the assessment of Tinubu’s administration, Lamido refrained from making a judgment, citing his background in the PDP and the complexities of the current political climate. He also addressed speculation regarding his potential leadership of the PDP, revealing his preference for David Mark as a more suitable candidate for the party chairmanship, given Mark’s experience and ability to command respect among party members.
In conclusion, Lamido’s reflections provide a sobering yet hopeful perspective on the PDP’s path forward, underscoring the need for unity, discipline, and a genuine commitment to the Nigerian people’s welfare in the face of daunting political challenges.
